Crosley C200 vs Pro-Ject Elemental

C200 vs Elemental comparison chart

Overall
Crosley C200
7.3
Pro-Ject Elemental
7.2
Votes 1 1
Rating 5 5
Add turntable to comparison
We didn't find anything to show here

Common

Product

Crosley C200
Pro-Ject Elemental

Model

C200
Elemental

Brand

Crosley
Pro-Ject

Reviews

213
13

Cartridge

Type

moving magnet (MM)
moving magnet (MM)

Catridge model

AT-3600
Ortofon OM 5E

Needle pressure, g

3.5
3

Stylus

Replaceable

Type

diamond

Stylus model

NP5
Ortofon OM 5E

Motor

Drive method

direct
belt

Motor type

DC

Platter type

aluminum diecast
aluminum diecast

Speed, RPM

33.3, 45
33.3, 45

Torque

>4.5 kgf-cm

Wow and flutter, %

0.2

Tonarm

Material

aluminum
metal

Audio features

Frequency response, Hz

20Hz - 20000kHz
20Hz - 20000kHz

Signal to noise ratio, dB

60

Specifications

Operation type

manual
manual

Built-in speakers

Built-in preamplifier

Pitch control

Pitch variation, %

+/-10

Power consumption, W

10
4

Other

has not
has not

Connectivity

RCA

1
1

AUX

0
0

USB

0
0

Bluetooth

User manual

Manual

Dimensions

Size, cm/inches

45 x 14.5 x 35/17.7 x 5.7 x 13.8
9 x 41.5 x 30/3.5 x 16.9 x 11.8

Weight, kg/pounds

5.3/11.8
2.7/6.4
Crosley C200
Pro-Ject Elemental
Crosley C200
Pro-Ject Elemental

Turntables CHooseratoR comparison rating

  • better
  • worse
  • 7.3
  • 7.2
  • 7.3Crosley C200
  • 7.2Pro-Ject Elemental

The Crosley C200 is better turntable in this comparison - check Crosley C200 price.